Is Ethereum facing a dangerous divergence? SSV founder Alon Muroch explains the potential risks to crypto’s #2 coin. Get the analysis. #Ethereum #Crypto #SSV
Explanation in video
Hey everyone, John here! Welcome back to the blog. Today, we’re diving into something really important for one of the biggest players in the crypto world – Ethereum.
Lila: “Oh, Ethereum! I’ve heard that name a lot, John. It sounds big!”
John: “It is, Lila! And like anything big and important, it sometimes faces big challenges. We’re going to talk about one such challenge today, a sort of ‘dangerous crossroads’ that Ethereum might be approaching, and what some clever folks are trying to do about it.”
So, What Exactly IS Ethereum?
John: “Before we get into the nitty-gritty, let’s quickly chat about what Ethereum is for anyone new to this.”
Lila: “Yes, please! Is it just like Bitcoin, another type of digital money?”
John: “That’s a great question, Lila! While Ethereum does have its own digital coin called Ether (ETH), which you can use like money, Ethereum itself is much more than that. Imagine Bitcoin is like digital gold – valuable and a way to store and send money. Ethereum, on the other hand, is more like a giant, global supercomputer that anyone can use to build and run all sorts of applications, not just money-related ones. Think of apps for games, art, finance, and so much more, all running on this shared computer system without any single company controlling them.”
The Magic of “Staking” on Ethereum
John: “Now, this giant supercomputer needs a way to stay secure and keep track of everything happening on it. For a while now, Ethereum has been using a system called ‘Proof of Stake’.”
Lila: “Proof of Stake? Staking? That sounds a bit like putting money in a savings account. Is it similar?”
John: “You’re on the right track, Lila! With staking, people who own Ether can ‘lock up’ some of their coins to help run the network. By doing this, they become ‘validators.’ These validators check transactions, make sure everything is legitimate, and add new ‘blocks’ of information to Ethereum’s digital ledger, the blockchain (which is like a public record book that everyone can see).”
Lila: “And why would they do that?”
John: “Good question! For their help, they get rewarded with more Ether. So yes, it’s a bit like earning interest in a savings account. But instead of a bank using your money, you’re actively helping to secure and operate the Ethereum network. It’s a pretty neat way to keep things running smoothly and securely.”
Meet Alon Muroch: A Man with a Plan
John: “Okay, so now that we know a bit about Ethereum and staking, let’s talk about our main story. It involves a very smart person named Alon Muroch. He’s the founder of a group called SSV Labs.”
Lila: “SSV Labs? What do they do?”
John: “They are key contributors to something called the SSV Network, which is a big deal in the world of Ethereum staking. Think of them as building important tools and infrastructure that help people stake their Ether more effectively and safely. Alon has been watching Ethereum closely, and he’s spotted something he thinks is a bit worrying – a ‘dangerous divergence’.”
The Big Worry: Ethereum’s “Dangerous Divergence”
John: “Alon Muroch is concerned about how staking is happening on Ethereum. Remember how we said anyone can stake their Ether and become a validator?”
Lila: “Yes, to help secure the network and earn rewards.”
John: “Exactly. But to be a validator on your own, you need a good chunk of Ether (currently 32 ETH, which is a lot of money for most people!), plus some technical know-how to set up and run a validator computer 24/7. If it goes offline or makes a mistake, you can lose some of your staked Ether.”
Lila: “Oh, that sounds risky and expensive for one person!”
John: “It can be! So, what’s happened is that many people who want to stake their Ether, but don’t have 32 ETH or the technical skills, do it through large staking services or pools. You can pool your Ether with others, and these big services manage the technical validator stuff for you.”
Lila: “That sounds convenient!”
John: “It is convenient, but Alon points out a potential problem. If most of the staking happens through just a few very large services, then a lot of the network’s security and control starts to get concentrated in a few hands. This is the ‘divergence’ he’s talking about. Ethereum is designed to be decentralized…”
Lila: “Hold on, John. You mentioned ‘decentralization’ a few times. What does that mean in simple terms?”
John: “Great question, Lila! Decentralization means there’s no single person, company, or group in charge. Think of it like this: a traditional bank is centralized – there’s a head office, a CEO, and they make all the decisions and control your money. If their main computer system goes down, you might not be able to access your funds. Now, imagine a system where the power and data are spread out across many, many computers all over the world, run by different people. That’s decentralization! It makes the system more resilient (if one computer goes down, the others keep it running) and harder for any one entity to control or censor. Ethereum was built with this idea of decentralization at its very core.”
John: “So, when Alon Muroch talks about a ‘divergence,’ he means Ethereum might be drifting away from this core principle of decentralization, especially in how staking is done.”
The Rise of Liquid Staking (and a New Wrinkle)
John: “To make staking even more attractive, something called ‘liquid staking’ became super popular. When you stake your Ether, it’s normally locked up and you can’t use it for other things.”
Lila: “So my Ether is stuck?”
John: “Traditionally, yes. But with liquid staking, when you stake your ETH through certain services, they give you back a special token. This token acts like a receipt or a claim ticket for your staked Ether. It’s often called a Liquid Staking Token (LST). Some people also call them Liquid Staking Derivatives, or LSDs for short.”
Lila: “LSTs or LSDs? That sounds a bit complicated. Can you break that down for me?”
John: “Sure! Think of it like this: you deposit your gold in a very secure vault, and the vault gives you a paper certificate saying you own that gold. You can’t use the gold itself because it’s in the vault, but you can trade or use that paper certificate as if it’s almost as good as the gold. LSTs are similar. They represent your staked Ether, and you can use these LSTs in other crypto applications to earn even more rewards, all while your original Ether is still staked and earning staking rewards!”
Lila: “Wow, so you get the staking rewards AND you can use this LST token for other things? That sounds like a great deal!”
John: “It can be! It makes staking much more flexible. But here’s the wrinkle: most liquid staking is done through a few very large providers. For example, a huge portion of all staked Ether goes through one dominant liquid staking platform called Lido. This means that one platform, and the group of professional node operators (the tech folks running the validator computers) it relies on, has a massive influence over a big chunk of staked Ether. This further adds to the centralization concerns Alon Muroch is highlighting.”
Double Dipping with “Restaking” – More Rewards, More Centralization?
John: “Now, there’s an even newer trend building on top of liquid staking, called ‘restaking’.”
Lila: “Restaking? So, staking your staked Ether again? My head is spinning a little. What’s the main idea there?”
John: “You’ve got the basic idea, Lila! With restaking, you can take your staked Ether – or those LSTs we just talked about – and use them to help secure other new networks or services that are being built, often connected to Ethereum. In return for providing this additional security, you can earn even more rewards.”
Lila: “So, it’s like earning rewards on your rewards?”
John: “Kind of! Imagine you’ve staked your ETH and got an LST. Now, a new project needs security. You can ‘restake’ your LST to help secure that new project and earn extra rewards from them, on top of your original Ethereum staking rewards. There are now even Liquid Restaking Tokens (LRTs), which are tokens representing your restaked assets, adding another layer.”
John: “This sounds amazing for earning more, right? But Alon Muroch points out that this could make the centralization problem even worse. Why? Because restaking often relies on the same large LST providers or new large ‘restaking’ services, like EigenLayer (that’s a popular platform for restaking). This means even more power and ETH value could flow towards a small number of big players. He’s concerned that while it offers cool new possibilities, it could also concentrate risk and control significantly.”
Lila: “So, more rewards, but also potentially more control in fewer hands, and maybe more risk if one of those big players has a problem?”
John: “Exactly, Lila. That’s the core of the concern. The allure of higher yields from restaking could accelerate this centralization.”
Why is This Centralization Such a Bad Thing for Ethereum?
John: “You might be wondering, ‘Okay, so a few big players handle a lot of the staking. What’s the big deal?’ Well, it goes against the very spirit of Ethereum.”
Lila: “Because it’s supposed to be decentralized, right?”
John: “Precisely! Here are a few reasons why this growing centralization is a worry:
- Security Risks: If one or two giant staking services are attacked or have a major technical problem, it could seriously impact the entire Ethereum network. It’s like putting too many eggs in one basket.
- Control Issues: If a small number of entities control a large portion of the staked Ether, they could potentially gain too much influence over which transactions get processed or even try to censor certain transactions. That’s not good for a network that’s meant to be open and fair for everyone.
- Less Resilience: Decentralization makes Ethereum strong because it’s spread out. If it becomes too centralized, it starts to look more like the traditional systems it was designed to improve upon.
- Impact on Innovation: Extreme concentration could also stifle innovation if dominant players make it harder for new, smaller solutions to emerge. This includes something called MEV (Maximal Extractable Value – which is basically how transaction orderers can make extra profit, sometimes in ways that aren’t great for users if it’s too centralized).
Alon Muroch calls this a ‘dangerous divergence’ because it’s moving away from the robust, decentralized network Ethereum aims to be.”
A Ray of Hope: What’s SSV.network and DVT?
John: “Now, it’s not all doom and gloom! Alon Muroch and his team at SSV Labs aren’t just pointing out problems; they’re actively working on solutions. This is where their work on the SSV Network and something called DVT comes in.”
Lila: “SSV? DVT? More new terms! So, what’s this SSV or DVT thing Alon is working on? How does it help with this centralization problem?”
John: “Great question, Lila! DVT stands for Distributed Validator Technology. SSV, which stands for Secret Shared Validators, is a specific type of DVT. Think of it like this: normally, one validator (that person or service staking 32 ETH) runs on one computer. If that computer goes offline, or the person running it makes a mistake, the validator can get penalized, and the network loses a helper temporarily.”
Lila: “Okay, I remember that.”
John: “DVT, and specifically the SSV.network, changes that. It allows the job of a single validator to be split up and run by a group of different computers, operated by different people or companies who don’t necessarily even have to trust each other. These computers work together to perform the validator duties. It’s like having a team of pilots for an airplane instead of just one. If one pilot in the team gets sick, the others can still fly the plane safely.”
Lila: “Oh, so it’s like teamwork for validators?”
John: “Exactly! So, if one of the computers in this DVT ‘cluster’ has an issue or goes offline, the others can pick up the slack, and the validator keeps running smoothly. This makes being a validator much more resilient and fault-tolerant.”
How DVT Helps Fight Centralization
John: “So how does this DVT help with the big centralization problem we’ve been talking about?”
Lila: “Because it spreads out the work for each validator?”
John: “Yes, that’s part of it! Here’s how it helps more broadly:
- Reduces Risk for Stakers: If you’re
Related contents